Book | Chapter
Description as the method of philosophy
a reply to mr Pettit
pp. 256-266
Abstract
Whether, in a symposium on philosophical methodology, it is a good idea to concentrate on Husserl, I do not know. The upshot of Mr Pettit's paper is that it is not. He has done so, nevertheless, and I must follow suit.
Publication details
Published in:
Mays Wolfe (1972) Linguistic analysis and phenomenology. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 256-266
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-01215-2_18
Full citation:
Tugendhat Ernst (1972) „Description as the method of philosophy: a reply to mr Pettit“, In: W. Mays (ed.), Linguistic analysis and phenomenology, Dordrecht, Springer, 256–266.